The San Gabriel Valley Tribune reportedthat the San Gabriel Valley Council of Governments endorsed the measure.
So court ruled that states could only collect sales tax from retailers who maintained a physical presence in their ‘jurisdiction nexus’.
Otherwise, they are exempt. The issue of taxing internet purchases isn’t new. It dates all the way back to 1992, a time when the very notion of ecommerce seemed more pipedream than mainstream. The ruling also stated that Congress could, at any time, enact legislation to override the decision. Now please pay attention. Therefore if a merchant has a store, warehouse, and similar facility in a given state, they are required to collect sales tax. That’s when the Supreme Court made its landmark decision in the case ofQuill North Dakota. What’s clear to us, however, is that the Marketplace Fairness Act, as currently proposed particularly the threshold for exemptions will be a major disservice to the e commerce industry usually and small and midsize merchants actually. Also, many of us are aware that there are quite a lot of persuasive arguments on any side of this debate.
It seems like each few months the debate regarding the collection of sales tax from sales via the internet seems to rear its ugly head.
For more information on the latest flare up, see thisReutersarticle.
This time the political winds have shifted, and the odds seem better than fifty that legislation on the socalled Amazon Tax will move forward sometime this year. Los Angeles Mayor Eric Garcetti is among the strongest boosters for the Metro sales tax measure. Now please pay attention. In July, Garcetti tapped two of his leadership team to spearhead efforts to pass the ballot measure. Besides, many, if not quite a few them my be rejected as political suicide or a political third rail,, there’re loads of fundraising ideas. Again from the Tribune, the South Bay and Gateway Cities COGs oppose it. Basically, amazon, that sold their first book in 1995, was a strong proponent of the internet tax ban for many years.
Amazon spent millions lobbying federal and state government agencies against the tax. Something happened that irrevocably changed their position.a perfect beginning my be to increase these exemption amounts to more reasonable levels, say somewhere in the $ 20- $ 25 million range, look, there’re no clear cut answers. As a result, this would ensure all established merchants are included, capture much of the sales tax revenue for the states, and encourage small and mid size business growth in the e commerce sector. Proponents of the bill point to available software that automates tax calculations, that they say removes the burden from small and mid size etailers. On top of this, this still overlooks the percentage of effort required to administer and pay taxes across the nearly 10000 local jurisdictions in the, their related tax holidays, and similar exceptions that define the convoluted tax landscape. Known the law, if enacted as is, will ‘tax’ these merchants’ scarce resources, push down profit margins, inhibit their ability to compete with the largest internet retailers, and potentially drive thousands of small internet retailers out of business. By comparison, a similar size Main Street brick and mortar retailer generally collects sales tax for one jurisdiction. Sales tax software does not completely remove the burden from these internet retailers.
Competing versions of the bill are ‘re introduced’ in both the House and Senate.
If interested, You can readSenator Mike Enzi’s draft.
The gist is that it requires all sellers to collect and remit sales and use taxes for transactions conducted over the internet, regardless of where the sale takes place. The Senate version offers a $ 500000 exemption for small internet retailers. The reason is simple. To fight the internet sales tax no longer makes strategic sense, They have established nexus in more states than not. Amazon no longer enjoys the excellencies of the tax exemption. Both sides have aligned under the guise of leveling the playing field for all merchants. Notice, big Box multichannel retailers never had this advantage. Big time’ internet retailers like Amazon, and their multichannel competitors, Walmart and Target, see an opportunity to turn this to their advantage. Known cash strapped states see an opportunity to inject much needed revenue into their coffers.