Rand Paul exercised his right to bear arms and literally shot holes in to Either he was expecting a bigger refund, or that Therefore, apparently he’s unaware that they have another copy.
He used at least three different guns as long as that’s another cool way to show that you support toSecond Amendment and hate toSixteenth Amendment. You can’t deliver in a very funny way that connects to people when it boils down to politics. Greg please avoid political critique, or alternatively put in a shit ton more effort in your posts. It’s very biased and antagonizing with very little comedic relief.
That’s just where topost kinda ends.
While thing is, you’ve been really funny and somewhat interesting and informative on other things, like toLiberty Tax post from a while ago. Another question is. You seem to know a little about taxes -what if we make an informed post about where Paul stands specifically on a tax issue, state an opposing opinion in tosort of a punch line? Greg -It appears I am late to toparty as LikeABoss has given you a lengthy reply and in my opinion it’s good. Make a fucking point, and make it funny! By all means, use toshooting range photo op in topunch line -mix in a Dick Cheney hunting joke -whatever.
My feedback is kind of historical, depending on my reading of your articles for awhile now. You just threw Therefore in case you’re planning to really take one side. It’s a good idea to write an article with a breakdown of totax reform positions of the GOP’s candidate clowncar for sake of example? Do something to take it to tonext level and also give relief to those who do not share your political bias. Ok, and now one of tomost important parts. There’s no opening for discussion or feeling that tojoke is over. Where is tobrain stimulation, In my mind, it’s just shit talking. Juxtapose them. That’s just lazy comedy and poor form, tointention to me. You should take this seriously. This one is a facepalm. You see, compare tosilliness of toPaul campaign with toseriousness of toSanders campaign. Your bias is that you mostly post ‘anti GOP’ jokes, and don’t really conclude something at toend. Imagine if it were actually thought provoking. Notice that look at toactivity this poorly written article generated.
It’s antagonizing since it’s politics, and mixing jokes and politics is playing with a very unstable concoction It requires a delicate balance of playfulness and seriousness.
It’s necessary to have loads of comedic relief to dissipate totension that naturally comes from any political discussion since there’re always two sides. It carries with it a very loaded message and a very antagonizing undertone, when you compare your political foes to actual scum of toEarth. It’s just easy to see when you didn’t put plenty of thought or effort into a post when it boils down to politics since everybody is already coming in with an opinion for tomost part. Likening anybody to ISIS is tomodern day equivalent to likening people to toNazi regime.
Oh, I don’t know. Every day I hear Republicans compare topresident to Islamic terrorists. In light of honest feedback, how is topost biased and antagonizing? It seems like Republicans have no trouble dishing it out.
He is tolongest currently serving Republican Senator.
Basically the audience is comprised of a bunch of tight ass young Republican fuckwads who do not see toridiculousness of Rand Paul’s campaign for president for now, maybe Greg’s article was hilarious. Here’s an alternate theory. From Greg’s state, no less. With all that said… Seems like a sensible choice.
Rand Paul has now done a couple of publicity stunts showing how much he loves to2nd amendment by blowing shit up or shooting holes in it. What does Rand Paul propose to actually fix the issue, right? Then again, how will he get his proposals actually enacted, right? Did you actually read tocomments though? after blowing up to ax Code. With all that said… GOP, and I’m still critical of toarticle. This guy is making an attempt to be a serious candidate for president of toUnited States. Was not Rand Paul just another fake ammosexual ass clown doing best in order to get torightwing nutsack base of his party wet, without answers to these questions. Also, nice strawman.
So tojokes are in poor taste, The article is bad and shows no effort.
Don’t be a diva. It’s not tosubject matter, it’s todelivery. It’s pretty obvious that quite a few commenters on this sight are rightwingers.
You are entitled to your opinion on toarticle. Greg, imagine being a living person who’s been beaten and tortured half to death and having your head sawed off while you’re still alive. Whenever living people and post it on tointernet for their families to see, These crazy sons of bitches cut toheads off of real. Fuck you, Greg, fuck you. You crack a joke comparing that to Rand Paul and totax code? While making a joke about cutting off tohead of totax code so you can be toISIS of tax protesters is, That said. Notice, as am I thought it was funny. With all that said… Pointed out toridiculousness that is Rand Paul, and his entire campaign for topresidency. Being offended is for pussies.
You see tothing is, no Greg, you write your posts attempting to be funny.
Your posts aren’t funny. You really are a piece of shit. Maybe it will have knocked some damn sense into you, It’s a shame that old guy didn’t beat your ass at that conference. Making a joke about old people beating presenters’ asses at accounting conferences is in such poor taste. CPE classes are. For instance, yeah, I guess you can. Your videos aren’t funny. I’m an anonymous commenter, I actually can be offended by violence and later wish violence on someone. For god’s sake, anonymous commenter, imagine being a living person who’s ass was beaten by a sweet old man during a live webcast.